Chat determining sex

Specialists in the US have offered a therapy called nucleoside.

In Charlie’s case we have been discussing for many months, how the withdrawal of treatment may work.

'Charlie's parents also asked the courts to consider whether it would be in the best interests of their son to undergo experimental treatment in the US.

'The domestic courts concluded that it would be lawful for the hospital to withdraw life sustaining treatment because it was likely that Charlie would suffer significant harm if his present suffering was prolonged without any realistic prospect of improvement, and the experimental therapy would be of no effective benefit.'The domestic court decisions had been meticulous, thorough and reviewed at three levels of jurisdiction with clear and extensive reasoning giving relevant and sufficient support for their conclusions; the domestic courts had direct contact with all those concerned.'The domestic courts had concluded, on the basis of extensive, high-quality expert evidence, that it was most likely Charlie was being exposed to continued pain, suffering and distress and that undergoing experimental treatment with no prospects of success would offer no benefit, and continue to cause him significant harm.'It comes after a High Court judge in April ruled against a trip to America and in favour of Great Ormond Street doctors.

Charlie's mother has posted a message on the website thanking people for their continued support.

At just eight weeks old, he was diagnosed with a rare genetic condition after he began to lose weight.

Leave a Reply